Qualifications and Curriculum Authority help | contact us

Working with the curriculum*foundation stage*key stage 1*key stage 2*key stage 3*14 to 19
homeinnovating with historyinnovating with historyHistory matters

 

It worked for me: key stage 3 cameos

Contents | If it’s so important, why haven’t we done it before?

Designing a visitor’s centre for Chesters Fort

Over a hundred key stage 3 pupils from 12 different secondary schools in Cheshire participated in one of a series of three residential visits to sites along Hadrian's Wall as part of a history and citizenship project organised by John O’Boyle, former advisory teacher of Chesire LEA, and John Crossland from the University of Manchester Archaeology Field Unit.

Hadrian’s Wall
Chesters Roman Fort, Hadrian’s Wall

The aim of the project was for the pupils to create proposals for a visitor's centre at the English Heritage site at Chesters Roman Fort. Pupils needed to draw on a range of historical and archaeological evidence to accurately interpret aspects of life in Roman Britain and make them accessible to a wide audience. In addition they had to consider how their plans for a visitor’s centre might impact on the immediate environment and the local community.

Visiting the sites

Each site visit took two days and the follow-up work approximately 5–10 hours to complete. The pupils visited four sites starting with the Museum of Antiquities in the University of Newcastle before going on to see the reconstructions at Segedunum and the Roman forts at Arbeia and Chesters.

At the Museum of Antiquities the pupils were given background information about key features of Roman Britain including Hadrian's Wall. The pupils examined a range of Roman artefacts and learnt about the archaeological techniques used in restoring and interpreting them.

At the Segedunum and Arbeia sites the pupils reflected critically on how archaeological evidence is presented to the public. The pupils considered how archaeologists had analysed their finds to draw conclusions about the past; they examined various interpretations of Roman life and what Hadrian's Wall might actually have looked like. They discussed ethical issues relating to building reconstructions on ancient monuments.

On arrival at Chesters historical site the pupils began to draw on what they had learnt so far and started to form proposals for a visitor’s centre. They were asked to:

  • question existing representations of life on Hadrian's Wall in the Roman era
  • think about what could be achieved by developing a visitor's centre at Chesters and the impact that this would have on visitors’ understanding of how historical evidence is interpreted
  • explore various alternatives and reflect on other pupils’ ideas when forming their own proposals for the visitor's centre.
Pupils at Chesters historical site Barrack block and Commander’s house at Arbeia

How should we represent the past? Pupils at the Barrack block and Commander’s house at Arbeia

Developing their proposals

Returning to school the pupils worked on their ideas for a visitor's centre at Chesters for a presentation to an audience of parents and teachers.

The pupils developed their proposals with creativity and imagination. One school presented their proposal as a drama exercise while another used models produced during design and technology lessons to illustrate their ideas. Yet another school devised a PowerPoint presentation to put across their ideas.

Extracts from one school’s PowerPoint presentation

Our proposal for a Visitor's Centre at Chesters Fort

Middlewich High School

 

What are our aims?

  • We want people to understand what life was like at Chesters Roman fort.
  • We want people to understand what it is like to be an archaeologist or historian.
  • We want people to understand that we are not certain about the past.
  • We want people to experience the process that archaeologists and historians go through.

How should we use the evidence?


How should we represent the past?

 

Should we build reconstructions on the site of ancient monuments?

Barrack block and Commander’s house at Arbeia
Barrack block and Commander’s house at Arbeia

Should we build reconstructions?

  • We should not build reconstructions on the sites of ancient monuments because future generations may develop techniques that enable them to find out more about the past.
  • Many people learn from reconstructions. We would like to build reconstruction near to ancient monuments.

How should we use artefacts?

  • artefactsWe should identify where artefacts have been found using plaques.
  • artefactsWe should build replica artefacts and then bury them so they can be used to recreate the role of the archaeologist.

Should we use modern technology?

  • artefactsModern technology can be very useful as it can show people what life and buildings were like in Roman times.
  • Models of Chesters fortWe would like to use models and graphics to show what we think life at Chesters fort would have been like.
  • We also want to use models and computer graphics to show that there are alternative interpretations. We would like the visitors to make up their own minds.

How can we make learning fun?

  • We should put something in for everybody: young people, old people, visual, auditory and kinaesthetic learners.
  • Activities should be ‘hands on’ so people can try things out for themselves. It is only by doing that we get to understand how things really work.
  • We should use human beings as guides and re-enactors wherever possible. People learn the most from talking and interacting with other people.

According to John O’Boyle,

‘The variety and quality of presentations and proposals offered was staggering. One school presented theirs as a drama exercise while another used models produced in conjunction with the design and technology department to illustrate their ideas. All of the pupils displayed a high level of confidence in delivering to an adult audience and one pupil commented that it was the fact that they had the opportunity to talk about 'their ideas', without fear of being told that they were right or wrong, that made the experience so engaging and enjoyable.’

The pupils drew on their experience of a wide range of historical and archaeological evidence in formulating their ideas. They questioned each other on the best ways to present their information and several pupils felt that they had gained a greater insight into the nature and reliability of historical evidence because they had been asked to consider how it would be represented to a wider audience. Many pupils continued to refine their ideas for the visitor's centre; one school redrafted their presentation five times before delivering it to the parents.

There were also long term benefits from this project. The pupils continued to show authority and self-assurance in class discussions on their return to school. This encouraged many pupils to become more inquisitive and analytical in their learning during subsequent history lessons.

For further information on Past below ground, Archaeology and Education Consultancy, University of Manchester Archaeological Unit, contact John Crossland at johncrossland@ntlworld.com.

‘A re-enactor of a Roman soldier came to the youth hostel where we stayed. He showed us what they wore, ate and used in battle.

It was very interesting and we thought it would be a good idea to have a dressed-up guide for our visitor’s centre.’

 

Contents | If it’s so important, why haven’t we done it before?

 
History matters
* Introduction
*

It worked for me

   
- Introduction
   
- Key stage 1 cameos
   
- Key stage 2 cameos
   
- Key stage 3 cameos
* New developments in history
* Promoting the subject
* Careers in history
* Key stages 2/3 transfer
* Subject associations and other organisations
 

 

 
Top of page
National Curriculum | National Curriculum in Action | Schemes of work
© QCA 2004