|
A key feature of Curriculum 2000 is that it allows students to choose year 13 options at the end of year 12. It may be seen as two consecutive one-year courses in contrast to the single, two-year course structure of the traditional A level programme.
At the end of a one-year course, learners may be reluctant to commit themselves to A2 work before they know their results, reducing the effective use of teaching time after the AS examinations. The issue for practitioners is whether, in this context, curriculum flexibility reduces curriculum efficiency. Conversely, a two-year programme might mean a more efficient use of teaching time after the AS examinations, but might reduce curriculum flexibility.
Case study: Curriculum 2000 as a two-year programme Case study: Curriculum 2000 as two one-year courses
Case study: Curriculum 2000 as a two-year programme
Esher College in Surrey has decided to present Curriculum 2000 to its students as a traditional two-year programme. Students are expected to decide, at the outset of the two years, which three subjects they will study to the full A level standard. The AS is seen as the first year of the two-year A level programme (the fourth AS is seen as an additional, broadening subject). The advantages and disadvantages of this approach are summarised below.
Perceived advantages of the two-year programme
- The major advantage is that there is no difficulty in continuing teaching and learning after the AS examinations – students embark on the A2 material in their three A level subjects. The college has a formal ‘back to work’ day, when normal teaching resumes at the end of the summer examination session.
- Most students (more than 90 per cent), know which subjects to drop after examinations in June of first year advanced level because they made the decision at the beginning of the year.
- Since the second year advanced level is not a new course and the basic pattern is fixed, administration, enrolment and timetabling are more straightforward.
- Because one subject studied in the first year advanced level is identified as a broadening AS subject, students’ performance in it can be tracked and compared with their other AS results. Esher College has found that there is a 91 per cent retention rate in the broadening AS subject, compared with 95 per cent in other AS subjects.
- Because students know which subjects they are going to take to full A level, they know which subjects to prioritise. Esher College students typically get grades A and B in their full A level subjects, and C and D in their broadening AS subjects. The lower grades in the broadening AS subjects may reflect less ability or interest in the subjects, as well as their lower priority.
Potential disadvantages of the two-year programme
- This interpretation of Curriculum 2000 appears to offer students less flexibility. Fewer than 10 per cent of each student cohort changed their minds about their second year advanced level subjects. The college finds that those with lower average GCSE point scores are more likely to change route.
- Having committed themselves to three A level subjects at the outset, students must be less likely to consider alternatives for the second year advanced level, particularly as the college assumes that they will continue with their original choices.
- While Esher College does not offer at enrolment programmes of two A and two AS levels, some students’ programmes do evolve in this way (although not as many as in some sixth form colleges). Most students from the college progress to higher education courses that have entry requirements of three or more A levels.
|

Curriculum 2000 as two one-year courses
Farnborough Sixth Form College in Hampshire takes the opposite view, stressing the advantages of two consecutive one-year courses. Students think of their programme as two separate courses, during which they may be in different teaching groups. They are encouraged to regard AS June assessment as the end of a course, and not to resit units unless they achieve a result that does not reflect their usual performance in a subject. The second year advanced level timetable is designed to meet student demand and everyone who wishes to continue a subject to A2 is able to do so, in addition to taking up a new AS if they wish.
Also see
> Curriculum design > Managing assessment > Teaching the new A levels > Individualising the curriculum > Timetabling
|
|